Verilog-Perl

Please file a "support UVM" or alternatively "don't require types predefined" bug and I'll follow up there.

Hey,

  "endfunction"        { FL; VALTEXT; CALLBACK(endtaskfuncCb); return yENDFUNCTION; }

Thank you so much!!

Yes, why not just try it? The lexer is at least one symbol ahead of the parser, so it might not do what you want.

Hey,

it works this way. But it would be nicer to have it in the parser instead of the lexer. Is it somehow possible to tell the parser, that a tf_port_list can include data_types from the symtable? So it can include predefined classes? So if I add a

class uvm_component;
endclass

The function is parsed correctly and furthermore correctly in the datastructure?

I really appreciate your help! Thank you!!

Another question just appeared:

What is VParseGrammar used for? In my program I derived My_Parser from VParse and use this in my Parser. Now I just saw, I could do something like VParseGrammar(VParse* pp) What is the additional uses of this?

Thanks

That's where the bison grammar is generated, you're using it under the covers.

Ok, that's what I thought.

Any thought about the parsing of classes and functions, that have variables with a class as datatype in the portlist?

Thanks

As I said above, you need to predeclare the data type.

Thanks,

where may I do it? Declare it as a keyword? Isn't ist possible to use the already parsed data_types like you do with the varCb?

Regards

Predeclare, as in make the "class foo; endclass" you showed above.

Yeah, that's what I did, but unfortunately, then not even the functionCb is called... I don't know why, but it does not work. Seems like the portlist in a function declaration only accepts standard types.

Here you can see, what happens. I added the log files and the parsed files.

Thanks

The problem appears with both classes and for the new() function of the config-file. You can see it in the log file in line 443 and in the log_with_... file in line 444

Thanks for any reply

Hey,

is it possible, that the -> operator is missing in the lexer, because it is causing troubles with my assertions.

Regards