We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author Name: Ed Lander Original Redmine Issue: 608 from https://www.veripool.org Original Date: 2013-02-01 Original Assignee: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Hi,
We have examples of the following declarations in our code that Verilator is unhappy with: wire logic wire_name;
This is valid SystemVerilog and both DC and Incisive seem happy with it.
NB. It should also be possible to declare a structure and infer a wire of that struct type.
Cheers, Ed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder) Original Date: 2013-02-02T14:33:12Z
All the logic was there, just needed to pull some parsing from Verilog-Perl.
Fixed in git towards 3.845.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Ed Lander Original Date: 2013-02-04T10:05:03Z
Great, thanks Wilson.
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder) Original Date: 2013-02-05T03:21:37Z
In 3.845.
wsnyder
No branches or pull requests
Author Name: Ed Lander
Original Redmine Issue: 608 from https://www.veripool.org
Original Date: 2013-02-01
Original Assignee: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Hi,
We have examples of the following declarations in our code that Verilator is unhappy with:
wire logic wire_name;
This is valid SystemVerilog and both DC and Incisive seem happy with it.
NB. It should also be possible to declare a structure and infer a wire of that struct type.
Cheers,
Ed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: