You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Author Name: Duraid Madina
Original Redmine Issue: 1022 from https://www.veripool.org
Original Date: 2016-01-12
Original Assignee: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Commit bf5dee9 ("Fix real parameters causing bad modules names, bug 992") causes Verilator to miscompile a production design I have. The culprit seems to be the presence of:
constp->num().isNegative()
around src/V3Param.cpp:475
at least in the sense that removing the above expression resolves the issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Original Date: 2016-01-21T03:09:21Z
I do not understand how changing the module name would make your design have problems, and suspect this is just paper-overing another issue. If you find it later, please file another issue on that.
However I agree isNegative isn't needed in this code. That's fixed in git towards 3.882.
Author Name: Duraid Madina
Original Redmine Issue: 1022 from https://www.veripool.org
Original Date: 2016-01-12
Original Assignee: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Commit bf5dee9 ("Fix real parameters causing bad modules names, bug 992") causes Verilator to miscompile a production design I have. The culprit seems to be the presence of:
constp->num().isNegative()
around src/V3Param.cpp:475
at least in the sense that removing the above expression resolves the issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: