We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author Name: Gregory Czajkowski Original Redmine Issue: 1056 from https://www.veripool.org
Instead of
typedef class a_t; typedef class b_t; typedef class c_t; typedef class d_t;
We get
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Kaushal Modi Original Date: 2016-04-18T03:49:13Z
I can see this problem too.
For clarity, which is what it looks like after indenting the whole buffer:
// ENUM TYPEDEF typedef enum {FOO, BAR} foobar_e; // CLASS TYPEDEF typedef class a_t; typedef class b_t; typedef class c_t; typedef class d_t;
instead of
Sorry, something went wrong.
Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder) Original Date: 2017-11-19T13:46:58Z
This was fixed at some point in the last year.
No branches or pull requests
Author Name: Gregory Czajkowski
Original Redmine Issue: 1056 from https://www.veripool.org
Instead of
typedef class a_t;
typedef class b_t;
typedef class c_t;
typedef class d_t;
We get
typedef class a_t;
typedef class b_t;
typedef class c_t;
typedef class d_t;
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: