Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

bus of wreal (packed array) not supported #1154

Closed
veripoolbot opened this issue Apr 11, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

bus of wreal (packed array) not supported #1154

veripoolbot opened this issue Apr 11, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
@wsnyder
Labels
resolution: fixed Closed; fixed type: feature-IEEE Request to add new feature, described in IEEE 1800

Comments

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Contributor

Author Name: j briquet
Original Redmine Issue: 1154 from https://www.veripool.org

Original Assignee: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)

Hi Wilson,

I faced an issue regarding usage of packed array for wreal net. Actually, I was trying to instantiate a module which contains a wreal input declared as a packed array (supported by commercial simulator) to an upper net declared the same way. But the tool returned two errors :

  • mismatch between port which is an array and expression which is not an array
  • expected non-complex non-double pin connection in width check

Is that error expected ? You'll find in attachment the file you've created for wreal bugs.

Best regards,
J-P
@veripoolbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Original Date: 2017-04-28T10:11:03Z

Thanks for the test. Fixed in git towards 3.903.

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Original Date: 2017-05-31T02:06:31Z

In 3.904.

@veripoolbot veripoolbot added resolution: fixed Closed; fixed type: feature-IEEE Request to add new feature, described in IEEE 1800 labels Dec 22, 2019
@wsnyder wsnyder mentioned this issue May 3, 2020
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@wsnyder wsnyder

Labels
resolution: fixed Closed; fixed type: feature-IEEE Request to add new feature, described in IEEE 1800
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@wsnyder @veripoolbot