You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At first glance, this seems to be a regexp for procedural blocks, but then it does not contain @Final@ (IEEE 1800-2012 Section 9.2). Then it has @module@, but no @Class@. So I couldn't correlate this set of keywords with any given set in the standard.
Do we need to add more keywords to this regexp?
A docstring will help tremendously.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author Name: Kaushal Modi
Original Redmine Issue: 1160 from https://www.veripool.org
Hi,
I was working on refactoring @verilog-prettify-expr@ function and I came across the @verilog-basic-complete-re@ and @verilog-complete-reg@ variables.
These are @defconst@ variables but they are lacking docstrings. So just looking at their values, I cannot tell what they mean..
Also, for consistency, should @verilog-complete-reg@ have been named @verilog-complete-re@?
Looking at @verilog-basic-complete-re@:
At first glance, this seems to be a regexp for procedural blocks, but then it does not contain @Final@ (IEEE 1800-2012 Section 9.2). Then it has @module@, but no @Class@. So I couldn't correlate this set of keywords with any given set in the standard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: