Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SigParser now rejects `ifdef #117

Closed
veripoolbot opened this issue Jun 15, 2007 · 0 comments
Closed

SigParser now rejects `ifdef #117

veripoolbot opened this issue Jun 15, 2007 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Collaborator


Author Name: Jeff Trull (@jefftrull)
Original Redmine Issue: 117 from https://www.veripool.org
Original Date: 2007-06-15
Original Assignee: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)


This bug was cloned from Perl-RT, rt27599.

Email addresses have have been truncated.

Id:   27599
Status:		rejected
Queue: 		Verilog-Perl
Severity:	Important
Broken in: 	3.000
Requestors:	jetrull <jetrull@>

Created:	Fri Jun 15 21:24:46 2007
Last Contact: 	Mon Jun 18 15:48:52 2007
Closed: 	Tue Jun 19 15:49:01 2007
Updated: 	Tue Jun 19 15:49:02 2007 by WSNYDER

Fri Jun 15 21:24:52 2007 jetrull - Ticket created

Subject:  SigParser now rejects `ifdef
SigParser previously ignored `ifdef statements in files it parsed, but
now produces this message:

Define or directive not defined: `ifdef

and terminates the calling script.

The previous behavior is more desirable because my use of SigParser is
chiefly to collect module port information, and embedded ifdef/endif
sections in the code are not really an issue.

Mon Jun 18 14:21:57 2007 WSNYDER - Correspondence added

On Fri Jun 15 21:24:52 2007, jetrull wrote:
> SigParser previously ignored `ifdef statements in files it parsed, but
> now produces this message:

I'm not sure how to fix this. I can easily add something to just ignore
all `{anythings} but this is insufficient, as the word after `ifdef will
get fed to the parser and it will blow up. The new parser unfortunately
needs to have fully valid syntax.

Is there a reason why you can't just use the preprocessor?

Mon Jun 18 14:21:59 2007 RT_System - Status changed from 'new' to 'open'

Mon Jun 18 15:48:37 2007 jeff.trull@ - Correspondence added

Subject:     Re: [rt.cpan.org #27599] SigParser now rejects `ifdef
Date: 	     Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:47:32 -0700
To: 	     bug-Verilog-Perl@
From: 	     Jeff Trull <jetrull@>

OK, using the preprocessor fixed this. Thanks!

Tue Jun 19 15:49:02 2007 WSNYDER - Status changed from 'open' to 'rejected'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants