Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support the increment operator in for loops #175

Closed
veripoolbot opened this issue Nov 4, 2009 · 3 comments
Closed

Support the increment operator in for loops #175

veripoolbot opened this issue Nov 4, 2009 · 3 comments
Labels
resolution: fixed Closed; fixed type: feature-IEEE Request to add new feature, described in IEEE 1800

Comments

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Contributor


Author Name: Byron Bradley (@bbradley)
Original Redmine Issue: 175 from https://www.veripool.org
Original Date: 2009-11-04
Original Assignee: Byron Bradley (@bbradley)


The increment operator is supported in 'generate' but not 'for'. Already have this working, I just need to create a testcase and I can submit the patch.

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Contributor Author


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Byron Bradley (@bbradley)
Original Date: 2009-11-10T21:14:49Z


Attached diff adds support for pre/post increment/decrement. Test has been added to t/t_for_loop.v and has also been verified on another simulator.

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Contributor Author


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Original Date: 2009-11-10T21:40:21Z


Thanks! Pushed to git for 3.730++.

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Contributor Author


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Original Date: 2010-02-07T12:41:11Z


In 3.800.

@veripoolbot veripoolbot added resolution: fixed Closed; fixed type: feature-IEEE Request to add new feature, described in IEEE 1800 labels Dec 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
resolution: fixed Closed; fixed type: feature-IEEE Request to add new feature, described in IEEE 1800
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant