Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Netlist parser with no library for cells #257

Closed
veripoolbot opened this issue Jun 1, 2010 · 2 comments
Closed

Netlist parser with no library for cells #257

veripoolbot opened this issue Jun 1, 2010 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Collaborator


Author Name: Laurent Lefebure
Original Redmine Issue: 257 from https://www.veripool.org
Original Date: 2010-06-01
Original Assignee: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)


Hi Wilson,
First of all, thank you for this great package!
I am dealing with netlist gate and note verilog. My aim is to perform quick consistency checks on netlist I am receiving. I want to treat the netlist only without any library informations.
The issue is when parsing the netlist, it drops all cell instances which have no definitions (as I don't have verilog librariesfor them). I would like to have a way to specify the parser to keep them and puts the input/output as undefined direction (or by specifying a list of pattern for inputs and outputs it will know what is an input or an output). There is link_read_nonfatal which will disable error message, here I would like something similar to control wether to drop or not undefined cells and to specify input/output pattern list.
Do you see a way to do so?

Thanks and best regards,
Laurent Lefebure

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Original Date: 2010-06-01T13:53:19Z


I'm not sure what you mean by "drops". If a module isn't found due to link_read_nonfatal it doesn't set the $cell->submod variable, but it doesn't delete the cell. It sounds like there's something specific you have in mind - if you'd like please make the edits you need to the package and send me the diffs and I'll make it into an option for you.

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Laurent Lefebure
Original Date: 2010-06-02T12:36:18Z


Thank you for the answer... I effectively did something wrong, nothing is "dropped".
I am not fully used to perl but more tcl adept.
Anyway, if the change I will make can contribute, I will keep you inform!

Thanks again!
Laurent

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants