Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an option for a custom header comment #421

Closed
veripoolbot opened this issue Nov 15, 2011 · 3 comments
Closed

Add an option for a custom header comment #421

veripoolbot opened this issue Nov 15, 2011 · 3 comments
Labels
area: invoking/options Issue involves options passed to Verilator resolution: abandoned Closed; not enough information or otherwise never finished

Comments

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Contributor


Author Name: Jeremy Bennett (@jeremybennett)
Original Redmine Issue: 421 from https://www.veripool.org
Original Date: 2011-11-15
Original Assignee: Jeremy Bennett (@jeremybennett)


As the FAQ makes clear, the user retains their own copyright in the generated code from Verilator. Good practice is to include a summary of the copyright and license in each source code file.

This is a suggestion for a new option --header-comment to allow a user to supply custom text to be included as a comment at the top of the generated files.

It would even be possible to extend this with --header-comment-gpl3 , --header-comment-lgpl3 , --header-comment-perl-artistic and so on to insert standard headers for well-known FOSS licenses.

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Contributor Author


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Original Date: 2011-11-17T04:39:26Z


If you'd like to take a stab at the first version (header from a file) I'm game to accept it back. Not sure how much it would be used, so I'd keep it simple and not have standard license versions yet esp since open source HW copyrights are rare.

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Contributor Author


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Jeremy Bennett (@jeremybennett)
Original Date: 2011-11-17T09:02:52Z


I'll have a go at this

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Contributor Author


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Original Date: 2013-12-15T00:19:54Z


Closing due to inactivity, if you or someone want to code this I'll gladly reopen.

@veripoolbot veripoolbot added area: invoking/options Issue involves options passed to Verilator resolution: abandoned Closed; not enough information or otherwise never finished labels Dec 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: invoking/options Issue involves options passed to Verilator resolution: abandoned Closed; not enough information or otherwise never finished
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant