Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

generate #425

Closed
veripoolbot opened this issue Dec 18, 2011 · 3 comments
Closed

generate #425

veripoolbot opened this issue Dec 18, 2011 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Collaborator


Author Name: Zeev Brunin
Original Redmine Issue: 425 from https://www.veripool.org
Original Date: 2011-12-18
Original Assignee: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)


Is verilog-perl is going to support verilog2K generate ?

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Original Date: 2011-12-18T23:15:17Z


In what respect?

It parses all of SystemVerilog 2009.

If you're looking for vhier to expand them, then it is unlikely to be the intent to ever do this; see the Verilog-Perl manpage on "Which Parser Package".

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Zeev Brunin
Original Date: 2011-12-19T06:09:34Z


When I build a netlist and trying to get a hierarchical path to a generated module
the concatenation of cell names gives me a single path to the module.
What I need is a different path for every generated unit.

@veripoolbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Original Date: 2011-12-19T12:31:02Z


I'm sorry, but that requires full elaboration, which is beyond the goal of Verilog-Perl. See the other options in the manpage I mentioned.

@veripoolbot veripoolbot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Mar 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants