Verilator bug in signdness of {single} #759
Labels
area: wrong runtime result
Issue involves an incorrect runtine result from Verilated model
resolution: fixed
Closed; fixed
Author Name: Clifford Wolf (@cliffordwolf)
Original Redmine Issue: 759 from https://www.veripool.org
Original Date: 2014-05-03
Original Assignee: Wilson Snyder (@wsnyder)
Verilator a985a1f returns 11001 instead of 01001, i.e. verilator
performs sign extension even though the result of { .. } is unsigned.
Self-contained test case:
http://svn.clifford.at/handicraft/2014/verilatortest/test010.v
http://svn.clifford.at/handicraft/2014/verilatortest/test010.cc
http://svn.clifford.at/handicraft/2014/verilatortest/test010.sh
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: