Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Kaushal Modi
Original Date: 2015-06-22T15:50:28Z

It looks like the @pure@ keyword is messing up the indentation.

       // this basically is a proxy to handle which applies the msg to the core process
       virtual class uvm_thread_handle_proxy extends uvm_object;
          pure virtual task apply(uvm_thread_notification_t what, process pid);
    function new(string name="");
       super.new(name);
    endfunction
endclass // uvm_thread_handle_proxy

If I remove the @pure@ keyword, indentation works fine.

Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Alex Reed
Original Date: 2015-06-26T22:06:15Z

Partially resolved in 56fe426. Indentation after pure virtual methods (in abstract classes and interface, maybe other places) should now be correct.

Note that the provided test-case is still horribly indented. I don't feel comfortable committing this file to the test-suite due to copyright issues. We will need to fabricate test-cases to isolate and test the other issues in this file.

Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Alex Reed
Original Date: 2015-06-26T23:08:12Z

Found one more - when a typedef has an enumerated value that is a keyword with different case (e.g. TASK, Package) and possibly when verilog-case-fold is t, then the indention engine gets confused. When searching for regular expressions that match keywords, the matches need to be case-sensitive, which is the opposite of the default for emacs.

Here's the fix: 832636e

There are still indentation issues in the supplied test-case which are already known - namely nested classes (http://www.veripool.org/issues/286)